Misquote
agent cards loaded.

Agent marketplace · BNB Chain

Hire an agent to run your liquidity position.

Four agents, each replayed over 30 days of chain history, each quoted as a range with the losses shown. You grant a session key that expires and that you can revoke in one transaction. Every marketplace misquotes you; this one shows its arithmetic — every number traces to chain state or a published assumption, and where the evidence is thin it says nothing instead.

Or read the arithmetic first: does hiring one beat doing it yourself? · how a quote is made

  • Wardenin range 6.1% · 498 moves · -0.039 WBNB
  • Gridin range 100.0% · 13 moves · 0.018 WBNB
  • Sentinelin range 9.5% · 498 moves · -0.018 WBNB

3 agents over one tape, on one scale — longest bar is the largest amount. In range is called against a 70% floor.

Router is not on this table: it holds no range of its own, so the columns here measure a position it never takes.

Rebalancing

Warden

COUNTERFACTUAL — this position was not heldchain tape
60 observations, spread wider than 0.06% either side of the median.
The bands are separated — the gap survives the spread, not just the medians. −64.31pp at the median.

P25–P75 across 20 sub-windows of ~362.9h each, annualised. 0 of 60 observations finished in profit. Why that differs from the 725.7h of tape →

In range: FAIL (6% of 522520)Beats holding: FAIL (0% of 60)

In range: threshold 70% · beats holding: threshold 50%

vs doing it yourself: −64.31ppagent loses to DIY by 64.31pp, bands do not overlap

  • fees earned+0.0099
  • adverse selection (upper bound)0.0026
  • costs0.047
net — bars scaled against 0.047 WBNB, the largest component-0.039 WBNB
Warden replay metrics
MetricValue
in range6.1%
decisions522,520 over 725.7h
moves249 mint · 0 recentre · 249 pull
Market making

Grid

COUNTERFACTUAL — this position was not heldchain tape
60 observations, spread wider than 0.20% either side of the median. Every observation is above zero, which is off this axis.
The bands overlap — at this sample size the two are not distinguishable, whatever the gap between their medians.

P25–P75 across 20 sub-windows of ~362.9h each, annualised. 60 of 60 observations finished in profit. Why that differs from the 725.7h of tape →

In range: PASS (100% of 522520)Beats holding: PASS (100% of 60)

In range: threshold 70% · beats holding: threshold 50%

vs doing it yourself: +13.35ppagent beats DIY by 13.35pp at the median, but the P25-P75 bands overlap — not separated at this sample size

  • fees earned+0.048
  • adverse selection (upper bound)0.020
  • costs0.010
net — bars scaled against 0.048 WBNB, the largest component0.018 WBNB
Grid replay metrics
MetricValue
in range100.0%
decisions522,520 over 725.7h
moves1 mint · 12 recentre · 0 pull
Health

Sentinel

COUNTERFACTUAL — this position was not heldchain tape
60 observations, spread wider than 0.01% either side of the median.
The bands are separated — the gap survives the spread, not just the medians. −37.07pp at the median.

P25–P75 across 20 sub-windows of ~362.9h each, annualised. 0 of 60 observations finished in profit. Why that differs from the 725.7h of tape →

In range: FAIL (10% of 522520)Beats holding: FAIL (0% of 60)

In range: threshold 70% · beats holding: threshold 50%

vs doing it yourself: −37.07ppagent loses to DIY by 37.07pp, bands do not overlap

  • fees earned+0.0017
  • adverse selection (upper bound)0.00046
  • costs0.020
net — bars scaled against 0.020 WBNB, the largest component-0.018 WBNB
Sentinel replay metrics
MetricValue
in range9.5%
decisions522,520 over 725.7h
moves249 mint · 0 recentre · 249 pull
Yield · Venus Core Pool (BSC) dollar markets and 2 PancakeSwap v3 range(s) at +/-80, +/-400 ticks

Router

COUNTERFACTUAL — this position was not heldchain tape

net return on supplied capital (realized yield − switch costs), over 125h — too short to annualise honestly

31 of 60 observations fall within 0.00% of the median. Every observation is above zero, which is off this axis.
The bands overlap — at this sample size the two are not distinguishable, whatever the gap between their medians.

median 0.03% · 60 of 60 windows finished in profit

Best rate seen
2.98%
Round-trip hurdle
1.06%
Moves
1 enter · 1 switch · 0 exit
Decisions
251
  • vUSDT1,954,290.91 USD ceiling · held 78
  • vUSDC404,339.03 USD ceiling · held 171
  • PancakeSwap v3 WBNB/USDT 0.05% · ±80 ticks1,751.67 USD ceiling · never entered
  • PancakeSwap v3 WBNB/USDT 0.25% · ±400 ticks91.57 USD ceiling · never entered

vs doing it yourself: ±0.00ppindistinguishable: -0.00pp is below the 0.1pp materiality floor

Router moved 1 time(s) over 250h. Best realized rate 2.98%; the widest venue gap reached 1.074pp against a 1.059pp hurdle — the edge cleared, and only just. It held the better venue on 68% of samples.

Router measured 2 PancakeSwap range(s) and entered none — size, not yield. A1 caps a position at 1% of its venue, so against 10,000 the ceilings are: PancakeSwap v3 WBNB/USDT 0.05% at +/-80 ticks tops out at 1,752; PancakeSwap v3 WBNB/USDT 0.25% at +/-400 ticks tops out at 92.

What there is to check

8 pages, each generated from an artifact this repository can regenerate. The figures below are counted from those files, not typed.